Workplace Arbitration & ADR
Alternative forms of dispute resolution can be effective in achieving favorable conclusions to workplace disputes, for both employers and employees. Whether voluntary, contractual, or judicially required, arbitrations are often more economical, faster, and less public than traditional courtroom litigation. Employers with global, national, or alternative workforces may find that arbitration is more effective for some claims and portions of their employee populations. In addition, arbitration programs governed under the Federal Arbitration Act also can help immunize employers against private class and collective action litigation.
HOW WE HELP
Seyfarth’s Workplace Arbitration & ADR team has been at the forefront of using arbitration agreements to avoid class actions through class action waivers, including before the United States Supreme Court. As a result, our team has accumulated advanced thinking, templates, onboarding strategies, multi-state surveys, and research on the legal issues that must be considered when tailoring and implementing a workplace arbitration program.
Our attorneys are regularly involved in drafting and tracking developments to ensure enforceability of agreements and to strategically adapt to changing developments. We have successfully enforced arbitration agreements, securing orders to compel arbitration and dismiss claims in both state and federal court. We have counseled employers of all sizes around the globe and assisted clients in developing arbitration policies and programs customized to their unique goals and business, as well as their geographic footprint taking into account issues under state and local laws that can impact arbitration.
Our arbitration experience encompasses the full suite of substantive areas of employment litigation and extends to multiple industries. We have deep familiarity and experience in American Arbitration Association (AAA), Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS), and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitrations, as well as a number of other alternative dispute resolution providers. In addition, our attorneys counsel clients on the pros and cons of arbitration agreements, including the scope of agreements, covered claims, consideration concerns (including California-specific considerations), and other issues. We are adept at guiding clients through mediations and internal grievance matters and have been selected to handle all employment arbitrations for a multitude of nationwide employers under their ADR policies. We have developed approaches to efficiently and effectively manage discovery in the arbitration process, with a focused approach to keeping appropriate limits on discovery to avoid unnecessary expenditures without compromising strategic goals. We have an impressive track record of victories in virtually every type of employment dispute in arbitration.
We represent employers of all sizes, from those with a single location to those with widespread, national, or global operations. Our clients range from Fortune 100 to midsize companies, and include publicly traded and privately held companies across many industries.
THE SEYFARTH EXPERIENCE
Our team delivers premium legal counsel through sophisticated application of technology and process improvement techniques. We ensure consistent, high-quality legal services through right-sized staffing approaches, increased efficiency using innovative technology tools, and improved communication and collaboration. In doing so, we combine our industry-specific knowledge, geographic coverage, and practice depth to benefit our clients. For substantial portfolios of arbitration work, we implement a customized orientation program designed to capture client goals, preferences, and requirements to ensure an optimal portfolio structure.
- Obtained a decision in favor of our health care software company client in one of the most important employment law cases decided by the United States Supreme Court in recent years. It was established that employers may lawfully require employees to enter into an arbitration agreement containing a waiver of the ability to participate in a class or collective action against an employer.
- Administered more than a hundred arbitrations throughout the country for a Fortune 100 company during the past several years as part of the company’s pre-dispute arbitration policy, including filing motions-to-compel in multiple jurisdictions. As part of this experience, the firm has created a vast database of template documents and research on jurisdictions to be able to efficiently and effectively file motions-to-compel.
- Represented several national clients in all employment arbitrations under their ADR policies. During the past decade, Seyfarth has successfully resolved more than 400 employment claims on their behalf. These claims range across the spectrum of labor and employment law—from breach of contract claims involving executive compensation and equity awards to discrimination and retaliation claims under federal and state fair employment practices statutes.
- Briefed and argued a case of first impression in the California Court of Appeal, successfully securing a published opinion that held that anti-arbitration provisions in two state statutes were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
- Won a precedential decision for a major accounting firm, affirming enforcement of arbitration for the employment discrimination claims brought by three plaintiffs in accordance with one of the client’s internal programs which applies to all US employees.
- Obtained complete defense award before FINRA for one of the largest market-making firms in the world where a former trader sought $50,000,000 in purported unpaid profits/compensation and an additional $50,000,000 related to penalties and other damages.
Related News & Insights
-
Firm News
08/15/2024
220 Seyfarth Attorneys Chosen as Leaders in Their Fields by Best Lawyers in America 2025
-
Media Mentions
01/18/2023
Noah Finkel discusses how out-of-state workers can opt into a collective action in Law360 Employment Authority
-
Media Mentions
11/02/2022
Noah Finkel Quoted in Business Insurance, “DOL rule change may fuel litigation”
-
Media Mentions
10/21/2022
Noah Finkel Quoted in SHRM, “Case May Clarify Who Is Exempt from Mandatory Arbitration”
Recognition
-
Recognition
08/17/2023
210 Seyfarth Attorneys Chosen as Leaders in Their Fields by Best Lawyers in America 2024
-
Recognition
08/19/2021
Seyfarth Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America 2022
-
Recognition
08/20/2020
Seyfarth Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America 2021
-
Recognition
03/05/2020
Seyfarth’s Tracee Davis Named to Board of New York Institute of Technology’s Women’s Technology Council
Alternative forms of dispute resolution can be effective in achieving favorable conclusions to workplace disputes, for both employers and employees. Whether voluntary, contractual, or judicially required, arbitrations are often more economical, faster, and less public than traditional courtroom litigation. Employers with global, national, or alternative workforces may find that arbitration is more effective for some claims and portions of their employee populations. In addition, arbitration programs governed under the Federal Arbitration Act also can help immunize employers against private class and collective action litigation.
HOW WE HELP
Seyfarth’s Workplace Arbitration & ADR team has been at the forefront of using arbitration agreements to avoid class actions through class action waivers, including before the United States Supreme Court. As a result, our team has accumulated advanced thinking, templates, onboarding strategies, multi-state surveys, and research on the legal issues that must be considered when tailoring and implementing a workplace arbitration program.
Our attorneys are regularly involved in drafting and tracking developments to ensure enforceability of agreements and to strategically adapt to changing developments. We have successfully enforced arbitration agreements, securing orders to compel arbitration and dismiss claims in both state and federal court. We have counseled employers of all sizes around the globe and assisted clients in developing arbitration policies and programs customized to their unique goals and business, as well as their geographic footprint taking into account issues under state and local laws that can impact arbitration.
Our arbitration experience encompasses the full suite of substantive areas of employment litigation and extends to multiple industries. We have deep familiarity and experience in American Arbitration Association (AAA), Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS), and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitrations, as well as a number of other alternative dispute resolution providers. In addition, our attorneys counsel clients on the pros and cons of arbitration agreements, including the scope of agreements, covered claims, consideration concerns (including California-specific considerations), and other issues. We are adept at guiding clients through mediations and internal grievance matters and have been selected to handle all employment arbitrations for a multitude of nationwide employers under their ADR policies. We have developed approaches to efficiently and effectively manage discovery in the arbitration process, with a focused approach to keeping appropriate limits on discovery to avoid unnecessary expenditures without compromising strategic goals. We have an impressive track record of victories in virtually every type of employment dispute in arbitration.
We represent employers of all sizes, from those with a single location to those with widespread, national, or global operations. Our clients range from Fortune 100 to midsize companies, and include publicly traded and privately held companies across many industries.
THE SEYFARTH EXPERIENCE
Our team delivers premium legal counsel through sophisticated application of technology and process improvement techniques. We ensure consistent, high-quality legal services through right-sized staffing approaches, increased efficiency using innovative technology tools, and improved communication and collaboration. In doing so, we combine our industry-specific knowledge, geographic coverage, and practice depth to benefit our clients. For substantial portfolios of arbitration work, we implement a customized orientation program designed to capture client goals, preferences, and requirements to ensure an optimal portfolio structure.
Key Contacts
Related Practices
- Complex Discrimination Litigation
- Employment Litigation
- Class & Collective Actions
- Employment
- Wage Hour Class & Collective Actions
- ERISA & Employee Benefits Litigation
- Employment Agreements & Covenants
- Separation & Release Agreements
- Discipline & Performance Management
- Handbooks & Policy Development
Related Key Industries
- Obtained a decision in favor of our health care software company client in one of the most important employment law cases decided by the United States Supreme Court in recent years. It was established that employers may lawfully require employees to enter into an arbitration agreement containing a waiver of the ability to participate in a class or collective action against an employer.
- Administered more than a hundred arbitrations throughout the country for a Fortune 100 company during the past several years as part of the company’s pre-dispute arbitration policy, including filing motions-to-compel in multiple jurisdictions. As part of this experience, the firm has created a vast database of template documents and research on jurisdictions to be able to efficiently and effectively file motions-to-compel.
- Represented several national clients in all employment arbitrations under their ADR policies. During the past decade, Seyfarth has successfully resolved more than 400 employment claims on their behalf. These claims range across the spectrum of labor and employment law—from breach of contract claims involving executive compensation and equity awards to discrimination and retaliation claims under federal and state fair employment practices statutes.
- Briefed and argued a case of first impression in the California Court of Appeal, successfully securing a published opinion that held that anti-arbitration provisions in two state statutes were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
- Won a precedential decision for a major accounting firm, affirming enforcement of arbitration for the employment discrimination claims brought by three plaintiffs in accordance with one of the client’s internal programs which applies to all US employees.
- Obtained complete defense award before FINRA for one of the largest market-making firms in the world where a former trader sought $50,000,000 in purported unpaid profits/compensation and an additional $50,000,000 related to penalties and other damages.
Related News & Insights
-
Firm News
08/15/2024
220 Seyfarth Attorneys Chosen as Leaders in Their Fields by Best Lawyers in America 2025
-
Media Mentions
01/18/2023
Noah Finkel discusses how out-of-state workers can opt into a collective action in Law360 Employment Authority
-
Media Mentions
11/02/2022
Noah Finkel Quoted in Business Insurance, “DOL rule change may fuel litigation”
-
Media Mentions
10/21/2022
Noah Finkel Quoted in SHRM, “Case May Clarify Who Is Exempt from Mandatory Arbitration”
Recognition
-
Recognition
08/17/2023
210 Seyfarth Attorneys Chosen as Leaders in Their Fields by Best Lawyers in America 2024
-
Recognition
08/19/2021
Seyfarth Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America 2022
-
Recognition
08/20/2020
Seyfarth Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America 2021
-
Recognition
03/05/2020
Seyfarth’s Tracee Davis Named to Board of New York Institute of Technology’s Women’s Technology Council