People: Jeffrey K. Ross, Partner

Photo of Jeffrey K. Ross, Partner

Jeffrey K. Ross

Partner

Chicago
Direct: (312) 460-5896
Fax: (312) 460-7896
0

Mr. Ross represents major employers in complex workplace litigation concerning employment discrimination, wage/hour issues, labor/management relations, executive employment contracts and employee benefits. Cases include class actions, collective actions, trials and appeals. Mr. Ross also represents parties in fair housing discrimination cases.

Mr. Ross is the Co-Chair of Seyfarth’s Hiring, Testing and Selection Best Practices Team, and has extensive experience with the EEOC Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. Mr. Ross also is the Co-Chair of Seyfarth’s Reduction-in-Force Best Practices Team and has extensive experience with employment restructuring.

Recognition

Mr. Ross’ peers continuously have selected him as a Leading Lawyer and a Super Lawyer.

Chambers USA ranks Mr. Ross one of the top labor and employment lawyers in Illinois and has reported:

  • 2012 – "He is noted for his activity in complex workforce litigation."
  • 2011 – He “focuses on employment, handling discrimination and wage and hour litigation, as well as employment contracts.”
  • 2010 – “He…is ‘extremely impressive – he is able to balance the legal niceties of any case with practical considerations.’”
  • 2009 – “He is ‘excellent at devising efficient strategies to put the client in an advantageous position for settlement discussions.’ He is considered a leading figure for discrimination, wage and hour and employment contract issues.”
  • 2008 – “He is an expert in complex employment litigation.”

Mr. Ross represents major employers in complex workplace litigation concerning employment discrimination, wage/hour issues, labor/management relations, executive employment contracts and employee benefits. Cases include class actions, collective actions, trials and appeals. Mr. Ross also represents parties in fair housing discrimination cases.

Mr. Ross is the Co-Chair of Seyfarth’s Hiring, Testing and Selection Best Practices Team, and has extensive experience with the EEOC Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. Mr. Ross also is the Co-Chair of Seyfarth’s Reduction-in-Force Best Practices Team and has extensive experience with employment restructuring.

Recognition

Mr. Ross’ peers continuously have selected him as a Leading Lawyer and a Super Lawyer.

Chambers USA ranks Mr. Ross one of the top labor and employment lawyers in Illinois and has reported:

  • 2012 – "He is noted for his activity in complex workforce litigation."
  • 2011 – He “focuses on employment, handling discrimination and wage and hour litigation, as well as employment contracts.”
  • 2010 – “He…is ‘extremely impressive – he is able to balance the legal niceties of any case with practical considerations.’”
  • 2009 – “He is ‘excellent at devising efficient strategies to put the client in an advantageous position for settlement discussions.’ He is considered a leading figure for discrimination, wage and hour and employment contract issues.”
  • 2008 – “He is an expert in complex employment litigation.”

Education

  • J.D., Cornell University Law School (1976)
    with Specialization in International Affairs
  • B.A., Cornell University (1973)
    School of Industrial and Labor Relations
    Saul Wallen Scholar
    Phi Kappa Phi

Admissions

  • Illinois

Courts

  • Federal Trial Bar
  • U.S. Courts of Appeals: Fourth, Sixth and Seventh Circuits
  • U.S. District Courts: Northern District of Illinois; Southern District of Florida; Eastern District of Wisconsin
  • Multiple other jurisdictions for individual cases

Affiliations

  • American Bar Association (Labor/Employment Law and Litigation Sections)
  • Chicago Bar Association

Representative Engagements

Representative Discrimination Class/Complex Cases

  • EEOC et. al. v. WRS, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110149 (N.D. Ill. 2011) (summary judgment granted re White employee associational harassment claims, denied re Black employee harassment claims, split re termination/retaliation claims); 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64184 (N.D. Ill. 2010) (waiver of attorney client investigation privilege). Opposing counsel-Fay Clayton (312-886-9078), Richard J. Mrizek (312-886-9078).
  • Hawkins et al. v. Groot Industries, Inc., et al., 210 F.R.D. 226, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15244, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15243, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15242, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5051, (N.D. Ill. 2003) (class certification denial, summary judgment dismissal of Hispanic named plaintiffs’ claims; summary judgment dismissal of some of African-American plaintiffs’ claims; race/national origin case alleging harassment and discrimination in multiple terms and conditions of employment). Opposing counsel – Uche O. Asonye (312 795-9110).
  • EEOC v. Jillian’s Entertainment Corporation, et al., 279 F. Supp. 2d 974 (S.D. Ind. 2003) (successful limitation of nationwide EEOC pattern and practice reverse sex discrimination hiring case to only one location, based on scope of EEOC investigation). Opposing counsel – Nancy Dean Edmonds, Kenneth L. Bird (317 226 7229).
  • Roman/Yepez et. al v. Grayhill Inc., Case # 01C1768 (N.D. Ill. 2001) (national origin class action challenging employer English-only policy). Opposing counsel – Douglas M. Werman (312-419-1008).
  • Clark et al. v. UARCO, Case # 96 C 6192 (N.D. Ill. 2001) (jury trial defense verdict on multi-plaintiff age-based failure to recall claims; summary judgment dismissal of age-based layoff and bumping claims). Opposing counsel – C. Drake Boutwell (847-272-2126).
  • Limbaugh et al. v. Venture Stores Inc., Case # 4:96 CV 1465 (E.D. Mo. 1997) (class certification denial, summary judgment dismissal of sex discrimination and Equal Pay Act claims based on differential pay scales). Opposing counsel – Jerome Dobson (314-621-8363).
  • EEOC v. Andrew Corp., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9233; 54 E.P.D. (CCH) 40,166, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cases (BNA) 804, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7760, 1990 W.L. 92820 (N.D. Ill. 1989) (Wall Street Journal, April 6, 1989) (trial and remedy proceedings in long running EEOC pattern and practice case alleging race and national origin discrimination in recruitment and hiring of entry level operatives and clericals). Opposing counsel – John C. Hendrickson (312 353 8551).
  • EEOC v. Christ Hospital, Case # 89 C 5258 (N.D. Ill. 1992) (EEOC pattern and practice case alleging race and national origin discrimination in recruitment and hiring). Opposing counsel – Gordon G. Waldron (312 353 7525).
  • EEOC v. Daniel Lamp Co., Case # 91 C 0289 (N.D. Ill. 1991) (reported on CBS “60 Minutes”); (EEOC pattern and practice case alleging race discrimination in hiring). Opposing counsel – John C. Hendrickson (312 353-8551).
  • Rizzo et. al. v. Means Services, Inc., 632 F. Supp. 1115 (N.D. Ill. 1986) (multi plaintiff manager case alleging race discrimination, age discrimination and breach of employment contract claims in hiring, promotion, termination and recall). Opposing counsel – Dale D. Pierson (312 236 4316).

Representative Wage/Hour Class/Collective Cases

  • Falco et al. v. ADP, Case # 07 C 1336 (N.D. Ill. 2007) (nationwide FLSA and statewide Illinois law class/collective action alleging exempt misclassification claims). Opposing counsel - John W. Billhorn (312-853-1450)
  • Adams et al. v. ABN-AMRO, # 05-61865-CIV-DIMITROULEAS (S.D. Fla. 2005) (FLSA collective action re regular rate calculation and off the clock work for mortgage service center employees). Opposing counsel – Robert Norrell (954-617-6017).
  • Mosack et al. v. ABN-AMRO, # 04-61333-CIV-COHN/SNOW, (S.D. Fla. 2004) (FLSA collective action re misclassification of mortgage consultants). Opposing counsel – David Borgen (510 763 9800).
  • De La Fuente et al. v. FPM et al., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24040, 148 Lab. Cas (CCH) P34,694, 8 Wage and Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1279 (N.D. Ill. 2002) (class certification denial in federal/state law class/collective action alleging underpayment of hours worked). Opposing counsel – Douglas M. Werman (312 419-1008).

Representative Single Plaintiff Discrimination Cases

  • Shaffer v. American Medical Association, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 20978 (7th Cir. 2011)(summary judgment dismissal of reduction in force based FMLA and age claims reversed as to FMLA). Opposing counsel - Jeffrey Taren (312-663-5210).
  • DeWolff v. Pregis Corp., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67524 (W.D. Mich. 2009) (removal upheld re state law reduction in force based age claims). Opposing counsel - Christopher D. Morris (269-382-5143).
  • Metty v. Motorola, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73645, 99 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (N.D. Ill. 2007), Wall Street Journal: March 12, 2007; Chicago Tribune: September 17, 2006, October 12, 2006 and March 9, 2007 (mid-jury trial settlement of senior executive sex discrimination claims re promotion, demotion, termination and severance). Opposing counsel – Arthur Sternberg (312 580-2302).
  • Kerecman v. Pactiv Co., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19088 (S.D. Ohio 2007) (summary judgment dismissal of claims for sexual harassment, retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress). Opposing counsel – Daniel H. Klos (614-261-9581).
  • Wright v. Hollywood Casino, et al., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6711 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (summary judgment dismissal of claims for age, race, sex and retaliation re transfer, work assignment, harassment and termination). Opposing counsel – Michael P. Bregenzer (312 946-4480).
  • Wang v. Bell & Howell, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6267 (N.D. Ill. 2001) and 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18407 (N.D. Ill. 2000) (summary judgment dismissals of national origin employment termination and breach of implied contract cases).
  • Kolpas v. G.D. Searle & Co., 959 F. Supp. 525 (N.D. Ill. 1997) (summary judgment dismissal of disability discrimination case). Opposing counsel – Patrick J. Sherlock (312 683-5575).
  • Barker v. Andrew Corp., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20858 (N.D. Ill 1997) (summary judgment dismissal of disability and retaliation based termination claims; denial on sex based termination claim). Opposing counsel - David J. Mathews (708-655-1149)
  • Schoolman v. UARCO, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9615 (N.D. Ill. 1996), affirmed in part, reversed in part, 122 F.3d 374 (7th Cir. 1997) (jury trial defense verdict on reduction in force age claim after summary judgment dismissal of age, disability, and pension claims was reversed as to age and pension). Opposing counsel – C. Drake Boutwell (847 272-2126).
  • Huff v. UARCO, 925 F. Supp. 550 (N.D. Ill. April 26, 1996; May 13, 1996), reversed, 122 F.3d 374 (7th Cir. 1997) on remand, 2000 U.S. Dist LEXIS 17956, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16426, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22426 (summary judgment dismissal of age based demotion and reduction in force case reversed on appeal; multiple orders on disputed evidentiary issues). Opposing counsel – C. Drake Boutwell (847-272-2126).
  • Gibbs v. G.D. Searle & Co., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11406 (N.D. Ill. 1996) (summary judgment dismissal of disability and race discrimination promotion and termination claims). Opposing counsel – Thomas J. Slota (312 939 5629).
  • Surti v. G.D. Searle & Co., 935 F. Supp. 980 (N.D. Ill. 1996) (summary judgment denial in national origin promotion case). Opposing counsel – Kevin B. Rogers (312 332-1188).
  • Tarver v. North American Co., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5545 (N.D. Ill. 1996) (summary judgment dismissal of reduction in force based sex discrimination claim). Opposing counsel – Clyde W. Beacham (312 346-4555).
  • Antos v. Bell & Howell Co., 891 F. Supp. 1281 (N.D. Ill. 1995) (summary judgment dismissal of reduction in force age discrimination case). Opposing counsel – Dennis J. Callahan (773 481 5386).
  • Greenberg v. Union Camp Corporation, 48 F.3d 22 (1st Cir. 1995) (jury trial directed defense verdict upheld on appeal re age based pay and termination claims). Opposing counsel – Douglas Moxham (617-345-9800).
  • EEOC v. Union Camp Corporation, # 92-1399 (WD. Pa., August 16, 1994) (trial defense verdict on religious accommodation discrimination claim re Sabbath work). Opposing Counsel – Wanda Flowers and Angela Hart-Edwards (215-656-7109).
  • Booker v. C.R. Industries, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31886 (7th Cir. 1993) (summary judgment dismissal upheld on appeal re age based reduction in force, demotion and termination claims). Opposing counsel – Stuart Jones (312 602-2424).
  • Hybert v. Hearst Corp., 900 F.2d 1050 (7th Cir. 1990) (substitute appellate representation on adverse age discrimination jury verdict re employment termination and equitable remedies). Opposing counsel – Wilfred F. Rice, Jr. (312 266 6206).
  • McDonald v. Union Camp Corp., 898 F.2d 1155 (6th Cir. 1990) (jury trial directed verdict on breach of implied employment contract claim and summary judgment dismissal of age discrimination termination claim; both upheld on appeal). Opposing counsel – Martin R. Sturm (313 961 0130).
  • Rose v. Hearst Corp. Magazines Div., 814 F.2d 491 (7th Cir. 1987) (successful reversal of district court jury verdict on the basis of inconsistent jury instructions in age discrimination and retaliation termination case). Opposing counsel – Wilfred F. Rice, Jr. (312 266 6206).
  • Gill v. Scholl College of Podiatry, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23486, 35 E.P.D. (CCH) 34,715 (N.D. Ill. 1984) (summary judgment dismissal of internal auditor’s race discrimination termination case). Opposing counsel – Edwin R. McCullough (312 987-9880).
  • Monahan v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co., 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17251, 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1513, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P33,608 (N.D. Ill. 1983), aff’d, 57 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1224) (7th Cir. 1984) (summary judgment dismissal of “reverse” race discrimination termination case; upheld on appeal). Opposing counsel – Thomas E. McClure (815 935 1117).
  • Blackwell v. Sun Electric Corp., 696 F.2d 1176 (6th Cir. 1983) (substitute appellate representation on adverse age discrimination termination jury verdict). Opposing counsel – David S. Haynes (615 764 1174).
  • EEOC v. Union Camp Corp., 536 F. Supp. 64, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10743, 27 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1400 (W.D. Mich. 1982) (Fortune magazine, April 19, 1982) (attorney fees and costs award against EEOC after trial defense verdict in national origin discrimination termination case). Opposing counsel – Martin A. Scott and Librado Gayton (313 226 4642).
  • Spagnuolo v. Whirlpool Corp., 641 F.2d 1109 (4th Cir. 1981) (jury trial and appeal of age discrimination termination case). Opposing counsel – Samuel M. Milette (704 372 9990).
  • Schroer v. Swift & Co., 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17102, 27 Fair Empl. Prac. Cases (BNA) 1332, 27 E.P.D. (CCH) 32,341 (N.D. Ill. 1981) (summary judgment dismissal of age discrimination termination case). Opposing counsel – Alan M. Freedman (312 726 1731).

Representative Labor Cases

  • NLRB v. Treasure Island Foods, Inc., # 13-CA-42746, 42958 (2006) (ALJ hearing and dismissal of unfair labor practices alleged to violate prior NLRB settlement agreement). Opposing counsel – Daniel E. Murphy (312 353-9777).
  • NLRB v. Detroit Free Press et al, #7-CA-42292 (2001) and 7-CA-39526 (1999) (ALJ hearing and decisions upholding/reversing multiple strike misconduct discharges arising from acrimonious 1995 newspaper strike). Opposing counsel – Joseph P. Canfield, Patricia A. Fedewa and Amy J. Roemer (313-226-2090).
  • Modern Drop Forge Co., 326 NLRB No. 138 (1998); NLRB v. Modern Drop Forge Co., 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 5185 (7th Cir. 1997) (ALJ hearing, NLRB Order and NLRA §10(j) injunction proceedings/appeal re unlawful interference claims). Opposing counsel – Sheryl Sternberg (312 353 7643).
  • Faculty Ass’n v. University of Dubuque, 289 N.L.R.B. 349 (1988) (ALJ unit clarification hearing and decision eliminating union representation for entire faculty bargaining unit). Opposing counsel – Charles E. Gribble (515 244 1437).
  • Int’l Molders Union, Local 118 and Joseph Tulock v. Midwest Foundry Co., # K81-92 C.A. (W.D. Mich. 1983) (summary judgment dismissal of claim to arbitrate apprenticeship grievance). Opposing counsel – William Ryan (616-381-0142).
  • Mid America Media, WTRX AM v. NLRB, 663 F.2d 17 (6th Cir. 1981) (ALJ hearing and appeal of union organizing campaign objections). Opposing counsel – Charles A. Forrest, Jr. (313 238 4030).
  • Jennings v. Gerson Electric Co., 259 NLRB 640 (1981) (ALJ hearing and dismissal of union activity based discrimination claims). Opposing counsel – Robert S. Bates, Jr. (312 372 1646).

Representative Benefits Cases

  • Marion v. Bank of America, Case # 08-CV-03867 (N.D. Ill. 2007) (removal upheld; ERISA preemption based dismissal of multiple state court executive severance claims). Opposing counsel - Laurel Bellows (312-332-3340).
  • Ramos et al. v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Puerto Rico, et al., 360 F.3d 53 (1st Cir. 2004) (summary judgment and appellate dismissal of multi-plaintiff case alleging early retirement pension plan provisions violated ERISA, Title VII and Puerto Rico law). Opposing counsel – Charles S. Hey-Maestre (787 758-8950).
  • Tarver v. North American Co., 919 F. Supp. 1128 (N.D. Ill. 1996) (summary judgment dismissal of multiple ERISA separation pay plan claims re breach of fiduciary duty, unlawful plan termination, unlawful interference with benefit attainment and unlawful benefits denial). Opposing counsel – Clyde W. Beacham (312-346-4555).
  • Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Quaker Medical Care and Survivors Plan, 836 F. Supp. 314 (W.D. Pa. 1993) (representation of ERISA medical plan against public assignee claim for payment of benefits). Opposing counsel – Jason W. Manne (412-565-5220).
  • Weber et al. v. Twin Disc, # 90 C 0873 (W.D. Wisc. 1990) (summary judgment dismissal of ERISA class claims for supplemental unemployment benefits). Opposing counsel – Matthew Robbins (414-271-4500).
  • Chicago District Council of Carpenters v. Monarch Roofing Co., 601 F. Supp. 1112 (N.D. Ill. 1984) (trial defense of ERISA trust fund contributions case). Opposing counsel – Albert M. Madden (708 782 9831).

Representative Other Employment Cases

  • Knight v. Pactiv Co., Case # 4:05-CV-45-H2 (E.D. N. Carolina 2005) (attorney fees award based on dismissal of wrongful discharge claims). Opposing counsel – Milton E. Moore (252 792 1169).
  • Hofmann v. Fermilab NAL/URA et al., 205 F. Supp. 2d 900 (N.D. Ill. 2002), affirmed ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir. 2003) (res judicata dismissal of multiple employment claims upheld on appeal).
  • Trzeciak v. Village of La Grange, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3773 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (summary judgment dismissal of police officer retaliatory refusal to promote claim). Opposing counsel – Thomas C. Crooks (312 641-2260).
  • Tardi v. Grayhill Corp., # 99 L 1940 (Cir. Ct., Cook Cty., Ill. 2002) (summary judgment dismissal of worker compensation retaliatory discharge case). Opposing counsel – Edmund J. Smiejkowski (773-229-9589).
  • Kesterson v. Davenport, 647 F. Supp. 41 (N.D. Ill. 1986) and 1985 W.L. 133 (N.D. Ill. 1985) (freedom of association retaliatory termination case). Opposing counsel – George C. Pontikes (312 220 0022).
  • OSHA v. J.I. Case Co., 7 OSHC (BNA) 1402, 1979 OSAD (CCH) 23,405 (1979) (ALJ hearing and dismissal of alleged willful OSHA violations). Opposing counsel – James P. White (312 655-1500).

Representative Fair Housing Cases

  • Burrell v. Chicago Housing Authority, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32702 (N.D. Ill., 2006), 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17568 (N.D. Ill 2005) (appointed counsel for public housing representatives alleging race discrimination in the provision and administration of public housing; dismissal order states: “[T]he court sincerely thanks Burrell’s appointed counsel and expresses its appreciation for the high level of representation provided … .”). Opposing counsel – Thomas Edward Johnson (312-578-8100).
  • USA et al. v. City of Elgin, Illinois (1999) (representation of municipality against DOJ, HUD, and fair housing organization allegations of systemic national origin discrimination in enforcement of BOCA-based overcrowding ordinance). Opposing counsel – Jeffrey Taren (312 663-5210) and Charla Jackson (202-353-9705).
  • IIeka v. Lyons, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9025 (N.D. Ill 1999) (pro bono representation of home seekers alleging race based removal of residential property from MLS). Opposing counsel – Philip C. Stahl (312-704-7700).
  • USA v. City of Waukegan, Illinois, et al., Case # 96 C 4996 (N.D. Ill. 1997) (representation of municipality against DOJ allegations of systemic national origin discrimination in enforcement of BOCA-based overcrowding ordinance). Opposing counsel – Anthony Grumback and Joan C. Laser (312 353-1857).
  • Travis, et al. v. Hartz Construction Co. et al., Case # 92 C 3254 (N.D. Ill. 1992) (Chicago Tribune, August 26, 1994; Chicago Tribune editorial, August 27, 1994; Chicago Sun Times, August 26, 1994; Chicago Sun Times editorial, August 28, 1994 (pro bono representation of home seekers and fair housing organization in $935,000 settlement of Fair Housing Act race bias claims against real estate developers). Opposing counsel – Richard A. Devine (312 603-5440).
  • City of Chicago et al. v. Matchmaker Real Estate Sales Center, 982 F.2d 1086 (7th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 113 U.S. 2961 (1993) (Wall Street Journal, December 15, 1992; Washington Post, June 15, 1991; Chicago Sun Times editorial, May 28, 1991; Chicago Tribune, April 12, 1991) (pro bono trial representation and appeal establishing liability and damages for racial steering of home seekers in violation of the Fair Housing Act). Opposing counsel – John L. Gubbins (312 431 0055).
  • Bethishou v. Ridgeland Apartments et al., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12112, 1989 WL 122434 (N.D. Ill. 1989) (pro bono trial representation in first Illinois case to establish liability and damages for sex harassment under the Fair Housing Act). Opposing counsel – James W. Malloy (312 427 1696) and William H. Hrabak, Jr. (312 782 4844).
  • Brown v. Phildon (N.D. Ill. 1988) (defense of first DOJ injunction action under 1988 amendments to the Fair Housing Act). Opposing counsel – DOJ attorneys; F. Willis Caruso and Michael Seng of The John Marshall Law School Fair Housing Clinic (312 786 2267).

 

Publications

  • Contributing Editor, Disability and Accessibility Law, Chap. 5 “Disability Law Issues under the Federal Fair Housing Act”(2006 IICLE)
  • Contributing Editor, The Developing Labor Law BNA (1982 to present)
    Associate Editor, Practice and Procedure in Labor Arbitration, Chapters 5-7 (3rd ed. 1990)
  • “American Legal Restrictions on the Use of Union Economic Weapons Against Multinational Employers,” 10 Cornell Int’l L.J. 59-86 (December 1976)
  • “Collective Bargaining in the Prison Sector,” Industrial and Labor Relations Forum, 3-30 (1972)

Pro Bono Representation

  •  Board of Directors, Public Interest Law Initiative
  • Advisory Council, Housing Options for the Mentally Ill
  • “Outstanding Service Award,” Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities.