Responding to the Donohue Dilemma

Cost

There is no cost to attend, but registration is required.

Responding to the Donohue Dilemma

Thursday, May 6, 2021
12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. Pacific
3:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Eastern
2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. Central
1:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Mountain

About the Program

In Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC, a class action seeking meal period premium pay, the California Supreme Court held that employers cannot engage in the practice of rounding time punches in the meal period context, and that time records showing facially noncompliant meal periods raise a rebuttable presumption of meal period violations. The Court also called into question the continued viability of rounding outside of the meal period context.

Please join us for a timely webinar where Seyfarth attorneys will discuss the legal and practical implications of the Supreme Court’s Donohue decision.

In this business-critical webinar, we will cover:

What Donohue states and what the decision means
Practical solutions and common applications
Best practices regarding rounding and timekeeping attestations
Meal period rounding issues

Speakers:

Andrew Paley, Partner, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Elizabeth MacGregor, Associate, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
David Rosenberg, Associate, Seyfarth Shaw LLP

If you have any questions, please contact Roya Shahnazari at rshahnazari@seyfarth.com and reference this event.

*This webinar is accredited for CLE in CA, IL, NJ, and NY. Credit will be applied for as requested for TX, GA, WA, NC, FL and VA. The following jurisdictions accept reciprocal credit with these accredited states, and individuals can use the certificate they receive to gain CLE credit therein: AZ, CT, ME, NH. The following jurisdictions do not require CLE, but attendees will receive general certificates of attendance: DC, MA, MD, MI, SD. For all other jurisdictions, a general certificate of attendance and the necessary materials will be issued that can be used in other jurisdictions for self-application.