Esther SlaterMcDonald
Partner
Commercial Litigation
emcdonald@seyfarth.com
Esther helps businesses find creative solutions to complex problems involving consumer data. She partners with clients to find the answer that best fits with their business philosophy and goals.
More About Esther
Nearly every business interacts with consumers and knowingly or unknowingly collects data on those consumers. A host of federal and state laws govern those interactions, and the law continues to evolve in this complex area. Businesses are regulated in how they communicate with consumers, what information they can collect and report on consumers, and how they must protect the privacy of consumer information. This extensive and intricate web of laws can be difficult to traverse, trapping entrepreneurs and suffocating innovation. Esther partners with her clients to help guide them as they navigate this web.
Consumer Class Actions
Clients look to Esther for practical solutions to the legal, strategic, and operational challenges presented by consumer-protection and data-privacy laws and for aggressive defense and early, efficient resolution of consumer class actions and single-plaintiff litigation. Esther represents companies in various industries, including telemarketing, direct sales, data collection, financial services, and food and beverage. She defends clients against claims of unfair competition, false advertising, invasion of privacy, and deceptive trade practices, as well as claims for violations of federal statutes, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Esther's practice includes a special emphasis on the FCRA and related federal, state, and local laws. She has litigated these matters in federal and state courts at all levels, from trial court to the Supreme Court of the United States, and she is a frequent speaker on credit reporting and background screening.
Regulatory Investigations
Esther's experience as a senior official with the United States Department of Justice provides her with unique insight into the legal and regulatory challenges that businesses face and the constitutional and procedural implications arising when federal, state, and local governments seek to regulate the same conduct. As a former official, Esther understands how regulators work, what they look for, and how they expect businesses to respond to oversight. She advises companies and entrepreneurs on how to structure their businesses to ensure compliance and regulatory approval, and, if a regulatory inquiry arises, she negotiates with regulators to get them what they need, while minimizing the burden and expense to her clients.
Appeals and Critical Motions
Similarly, Esther's background as an appellate litigator and clerk gave her extensive knowledge of various substantive areas of law, an understanding of the practical implications of varying judicial philosophies, and keen insight on using civil procedure to win cases, particularly those with difficult facts. As a result, she has an interdisciplinary approach to the law and a knack for finding creative solutions for winning complex cases and winning them early. For example, Esther has used targeted dispositive motions on matters like standing, personal jurisdiction, and minimum pleading requirements to obtain dismissals of class actions before discovery. In one case, she used her understanding of constitutional law and states' rights to obtain a judgment that state law prohibited certifying a class on a state-law claim pending in federal court. In another, she negotiated a class action settlement early before discovery, enabling the client to avoid the costs of protracted litigation, and invasive discovery. Because of her skill in resolving cases, Esther is often brought into pending cases to find solutions that others have missed.
Counseling
Outside of litigation, Esther counsels clients on compliance and provides compliance reviews with gap analyses. She provides guidance on how to use technology to streamline compliance and to simplify business practices and how to ensure any existing uses of technology comply with current law. For instance, she has advised clients on using biometric data for identity verification, information security, background screening, customer service, and employee access. She has also advised entrepreneurs on innovative uses of blockchain technology to connect workers, suppliers, and customers securely and safely.
Esther enjoys finding simple solutions to complex problems, especially when that involves entrepreneurial clients and emerging technologies, and she relishes the challenge of winning the unwinnable case. She also likes predicting how small shifts in one area of law will create a ripple effect, and then identifying how to navigate those changes to her clients' benefit.
Pro Bono
Most of all, Esther is grateful for the opportunities she has to serve as pro bono counsel to nonprofits and to individuals unable to afford counsel. She's proud that Seyfarth supports its attorneys giving back to the community. Outside of work, Esther likes volunteering with local community organizations and traveling to any place she's never been before.
Consumer Class Actions
Clients look to Esther for practical solutions to the legal, strategic, and operational challenges presented by consumer-protection and data-privacy laws and for aggressive defense and early, efficient resolution of consumer class actions and single-plaintiff litigation. Esther represents companies in various industries, including telemarketing, direct sales, data collection, financial services, and food and beverage. She defends clients against claims of unfair competition, false advertising, invasion of privacy, and deceptive trade practices, as well as claims for violations of federal statutes, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Esther's practice includes a special emphasis on the FCRA and related federal, state, and local laws. She has litigated these matters in federal and state courts at all levels, from trial court to the Supreme Court of the United States, and she is a frequent speaker on credit reporting and background screening.
Regulatory Investigations
Esther's experience as a senior official with the United States Department of Justice provides her with unique insight into the legal and regulatory challenges that businesses face and the constitutional and procedural implications arising when federal, state, and local governments seek to regulate the same conduct. As a former official, Esther understands how regulators work, what they look for, and how they expect businesses to respond to oversight. She advises companies and entrepreneurs on how to structure their businesses to ensure compliance and regulatory approval, and, if a regulatory inquiry arises, she negotiates with regulators to get them what they need, while minimizing the burden and expense to her clients.
Appeals and Critical Motions
Similarly, Esther's background as an appellate litigator and clerk gave her extensive knowledge of various substantive areas of law, an understanding of the practical implications of varying judicial philosophies, and keen insight on using civil procedure to win cases, particularly those with difficult facts. As a result, she has an interdisciplinary approach to the law and a knack for finding creative solutions for winning complex cases and winning them early. For example, Esther has used targeted dispositive motions on matters like standing, personal jurisdiction, and minimum pleading requirements to obtain dismissals of class actions before discovery. In one case, she used her understanding of constitutional law and states' rights to obtain a judgment that state law prohibited certifying a class on a state-law claim pending in federal court. In another, she negotiated a class action settlement early before discovery, enabling the client to avoid the costs of protracted litigation, and invasive discovery. Because of her skill in resolving cases, Esther is often brought into pending cases to find solutions that others have missed.
Counseling
Outside of litigation, Esther counsels clients on compliance and provides compliance reviews with gap analyses. She provides guidance on how to use technology to streamline compliance and to simplify business practices and how to ensure any existing uses of technology comply with current law. For instance, she has advised clients on using biometric data for identity verification, information security, background screening, customer service, and employee access. She has also advised entrepreneurs on innovative uses of blockchain technology to connect workers, suppliers, and customers securely and safely.
Esther enjoys finding simple solutions to complex problems, especially when that involves entrepreneurial clients and emerging technologies, and she relishes the challenge of winning the unwinnable case. She also likes predicting how small shifts in one area of law will create a ripple effect, and then identifying how to navigate those changes to her clients' benefit.
Pro Bono
Most of all, Esther is grateful for the opportunities she has to serve as pro bono counsel to nonprofits and to individuals unable to afford counsel. She's proud that Seyfarth supports its attorneys giving back to the community. Outside of work, Esther likes volunteering with local community organizations and traveling to any place she's never been before.
- JD, Notre Dame Law School
Summa cum laude
Dean Joseph O'Meara Award
Notre Dame Law Review, articles editor - BA, Pensacola Christian College
English & HistorySumma cum laude
Clerkships
- Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (The Honorable James L. Edmondson)
- District of Columbia
- Georgia
- Virginia
- US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
- US District Court, District of Columbia
- US District Court, Northern District of Georgia
- US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
- US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
- US District Court, Western District of Virginia
Related Services
- Appellate
- Background Checking & Drug Testing
- Class & Collective Actions
- Consumer Class Actions
- Commercial Litigation
- Employment
- Handbooks & Policy Development
- International Dispute Resolution
- Privacy & Cybersecurity
- Product Liability & Complex Tort
- Real Estate Litigation
- Talent Acquisition & Onboarding
- Trial
- Workplace Privacy & Biometrics
Related Key Industries
Blogs
- Defended international consumer reporting agency against numerous class actions complaints alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and/or related state laws. The trial courts in various jurisdictions granted dismissal of the complaints.
- Defended leading background screening company at trial against plaintiff alleging inaccurate, criminal records reporting and seeking nearly $10 million in damages. The trial court granted the defendant's motion for a directed verdict following the close of plaintiff's case at trial.
- Defended a large data company against a Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the claim without settlement after informal discovery and negotiations.
- Defended a hotel company against allegations that its government contract violated federal and local law due to the company's connections with high-ranking government officials. The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss.
- Defended global staffing company against a national class action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss, and the dismissal was affirmed on appeal.
- Defended beverage distributor against class action alleging background-screening violations, and negotiated an early class settlement without formal discovery.
- Defended a nationwide retailer against national class action alleging retailer failed to provide proper disclosures and adverse-action notices to consumers seeking employment. The named plaintiff reluctantly agreed to settle a much narrower class of consumers who had submitted employment applications to a particular business unit.
- Defended a financial services company against a national class action alleging that defendant mishandled consumer disputes. After negotiations but before substantial discovery, the plaintiff agreed to dismiss his class claims and settle on an individual basis.
Related News & Insights
-
Media Mentions
11/06/2024
Esther Slater McDonald Discusses Issue of Judge-Shopping in Legal Dive & Yahoo! Finance
-
Firm News
08/15/2024
220 Seyfarth Attorneys Chosen as Leaders in Their Fields by Best Lawyers in America 2025
-
Recognition
08/17/2023
210 Seyfarth Attorneys Chosen as Leaders in Their Fields by Best Lawyers in America 2024
-
Blog Post
Jun 9, 2023
Seyfarth Shaw’s Consumer Class Action and Product Liability Groups Receive Coveted Recognition from Legal 500
- Listed in Best Lawyers in America (Woodward/White Inc.) for Commercial Litigation (2021-2025)
- Recognized as a Recommended Attorney for Product liability, mass tort and class action - defense: consumer products (including tobacco), The Legal 500 (Legalese Ltd.) (2023-2024)
- American Bar Association
- Co-Author, "Consumer Financial Services Litigation," 2024 Commercial Litigation Outlook, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (February 2024)
- Co-Author, "New York Proposes Bill to Expand Business Interruption Coverage for COVID-19 Losses," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 1, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Business Interruption Coverage for COVID-19-Related Losses under Commercial First-Party Property Policies," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (March 20, 2020)
- Author, "Ninth Circuit Rules That Users, Not Consumers, Must Prove an Authorized Purpose for Obtaining a Consumer Report," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (November 21, 2019)
- Co-Author, "The Ninth Circuit Demands Simplicity: Background Check Disclosure Forms That Contain State-Law Notices or Improper Grammar Violate the FCRA," Management Alert, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 31, 2019)
- Co-Author, "For Civil Litigants, Confusion About the Effect of the Federal Government Shutdown," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 11, 2019)
- Co-Author, "CFPB Commotion Continues: Leandra English Resigns from CFPB Deputy Director Post," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 9, 2018)
- Co-Author, "An SDNY Dilemma: CFPB Held Unconstitutional Over Director Removal Provision," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 27, 2018)
- Co-Author, "Limiting Class Action Tolling: Supreme Court Rules That Filing A Class Action Does Not Toll The Limitations Period for Successive Class Actions," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 20, 2018)
- Co-Author, "States Moving To Fill Perceived Void in CFPB Enforcement," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 12, 2018)
- Co-Author, "Win Some, Lose Some: Trump Gets a Loss and a Win in the Fight to Control the CFPB," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (February 6, 2018)
- Co-Author, "Under New Leadership, CFPB No Longer Interested in Pushing the Envelope on Consumer Protection Laws," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 29, 2018)
- Co-Author, "D.C. Circuit to Hear Appeal in Fight to Control CFPB," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 17, 2018)
- Co-Author, "Another One Bites the Dust - the President Kills the CFPB Arbitration Rule," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (November 3, 2017)
- Co-Author, "Vice President Casts Deciding Vote to Overturn CFPB’s Proposed Arbitration Rule," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (October 26, 2017)
- Co-Author, "The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Summer Gift to Plaintiff’s Counsel," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 17, 2017)
- Co-Author, “The Positives and Negatives of the FCC’s Recent Omnibus Order on the TCPA,” Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 15, 2015)
- Co-Author, “Game Changer? The Supreme Court Agrees to Consider Standards for Certifying FLSA Collective Actions and State Law Class Actions,” Wage & Hour Litigation Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 9, 2015)
- “Supreme Court to Weigh in on Trial By Formula,” Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 8, 2015)
- “7th Circ. Says Random Sampling Works For CAFA, Not How,” Law360 (October 15, 2014)
- “Plaintiffs Seeking Remand Under CAFA Home State Exception Must Present Evidence of Putative Class Members’ Citizenship,” Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 24, 2014)
- Co-Author, “Supreme Court Receives Petitioner’s Brief and Eight Supporting Briefs In Significant Class Action Involving “Unsettled Question” of Whether Tolling Applies to a Statute of Repose,” Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 24, 2014)
- Co-Author, “Supreme Court Decision: Regulatory Takings,” Engage, Volume 6, Issue 1 (May 2005)
- “Patenting Human Life and the Rebirth of the Thirteenth Amendment,” Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 78, Issue 4 (2003)
- Co-Presenter, "Commercial Litigation Outlook: Part 1: Insights and Predictions for Litigation Trends in 2022," Webinar Series, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 12, 2022)
- Co-Presenter, "The CARES Act: Modifications to FCRA Duties," Webinar, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 27, 2021)
- Co-Presenter, "Insurance Coverage for Business Interruption Losses," Webinar, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 3, 2020)
- Co-Presenter, "Consero’s Corporate Litigation Executive Roundtable," Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 10, 2018)
- Speaker, "Investigate Consumer Reports: Litigation Trends and the Salary History Ban Movement," 2018 NAPBS Mid-Year Legislative & Regulatory Conference (Apr 16, 2018)
- Speaker, "End-User FAQs: What Do I Say When My Client Asks ________?," National Association of Professional Background Screeners’ Annual Conference (Sep 19, 2017)
- Speaker, "Conducting Legal and Compliant Background Checks," C4CM Events (May 9, 2017)
- Speaker, "Don't Be a Target: How to Respond to Disputes to Reduce Your Risk of Being Sued," National Association of Professional Background Screeners’ Mid-Year Legislative & Regulatory Conference (Mar 20, 2017)
- Speaker, "What Consumer Reporting Agencies Should Know About Ban the Box Legislation and Its Impact on the Adverse Action Process," National Association of Professional Background Screeners’ Annual Conference (Sep 20, 2016)
- Meals on Wheels Atlanta volunteer
- Notre Dame Club of Atlanta member
- Atlanta Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society executive board member
- Industry Practices Committee of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners co-chair
- Consumer Class Defense Blog co-editor
- CGL Reporter editorial board, 2014-2017
Esther helps businesses find creative solutions to complex problems involving consumer data. She partners with clients to find the answer that best fits with their business philosophy and goals.
More About Esther
Nearly every business interacts with consumers and knowingly or unknowingly collects data on those consumers. A host of federal and state laws govern those interactions, and the law continues to evolve in this complex area. Businesses are regulated in how they communicate with consumers, what information they can collect and report on consumers, and how they must protect the privacy of consumer information. This extensive and intricate web of laws can be difficult to traverse, trapping entrepreneurs and suffocating innovation. Esther partners with her clients to help guide them as they navigate this web.
Consumer Class Actions
Clients look to Esther for practical solutions to the legal, strategic, and operational challenges presented by consumer-protection and data-privacy laws and for aggressive defense and early, efficient resolution of consumer class actions and single-plaintiff litigation. Esther represents companies in various industries, including telemarketing, direct sales, data collection, financial services, and food and beverage. She defends clients against claims of unfair competition, false advertising, invasion of privacy, and deceptive trade practices, as well as claims for violations of federal statutes, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Esther's practice includes a special emphasis on the FCRA and related federal, state, and local laws. She has litigated these matters in federal and state courts at all levels, from trial court to the Supreme Court of the United States, and she is a frequent speaker on credit reporting and background screening.
Regulatory Investigations
Esther's experience as a senior official with the United States Department of Justice provides her with unique insight into the legal and regulatory challenges that businesses face and the constitutional and procedural implications arising when federal, state, and local governments seek to regulate the same conduct. As a former official, Esther understands how regulators work, what they look for, and how they expect businesses to respond to oversight. She advises companies and entrepreneurs on how to structure their businesses to ensure compliance and regulatory approval, and, if a regulatory inquiry arises, she negotiates with regulators to get them what they need, while minimizing the burden and expense to her clients.
Appeals and Critical Motions
Similarly, Esther's background as an appellate litigator and clerk gave her extensive knowledge of various substantive areas of law, an understanding of the practical implications of varying judicial philosophies, and keen insight on using civil procedure to win cases, particularly those with difficult facts. As a result, she has an interdisciplinary approach to the law and a knack for finding creative solutions for winning complex cases and winning them early. For example, Esther has used targeted dispositive motions on matters like standing, personal jurisdiction, and minimum pleading requirements to obtain dismissals of class actions before discovery. In one case, she used her understanding of constitutional law and states' rights to obtain a judgment that state law prohibited certifying a class on a state-law claim pending in federal court. In another, she negotiated a class action settlement early before discovery, enabling the client to avoid the costs of protracted litigation, and invasive discovery. Because of her skill in resolving cases, Esther is often brought into pending cases to find solutions that others have missed.
Counseling
Outside of litigation, Esther counsels clients on compliance and provides compliance reviews with gap analyses. She provides guidance on how to use technology to streamline compliance and to simplify business practices and how to ensure any existing uses of technology comply with current law. For instance, she has advised clients on using biometric data for identity verification, information security, background screening, customer service, and employee access. She has also advised entrepreneurs on innovative uses of blockchain technology to connect workers, suppliers, and customers securely and safely.
Esther enjoys finding simple solutions to complex problems, especially when that involves entrepreneurial clients and emerging technologies, and she relishes the challenge of winning the unwinnable case. She also likes predicting how small shifts in one area of law will create a ripple effect, and then identifying how to navigate those changes to her clients' benefit.
Pro Bono
Most of all, Esther is grateful for the opportunities she has to serve as pro bono counsel to nonprofits and to individuals unable to afford counsel. She's proud that Seyfarth supports its attorneys giving back to the community. Outside of work, Esther likes volunteering with local community organizations and traveling to any place she's never been before.
Consumer Class Actions
Clients look to Esther for practical solutions to the legal, strategic, and operational challenges presented by consumer-protection and data-privacy laws and for aggressive defense and early, efficient resolution of consumer class actions and single-plaintiff litigation. Esther represents companies in various industries, including telemarketing, direct sales, data collection, financial services, and food and beverage. She defends clients against claims of unfair competition, false advertising, invasion of privacy, and deceptive trade practices, as well as claims for violations of federal statutes, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Esther's practice includes a special emphasis on the FCRA and related federal, state, and local laws. She has litigated these matters in federal and state courts at all levels, from trial court to the Supreme Court of the United States, and she is a frequent speaker on credit reporting and background screening.
Regulatory Investigations
Esther's experience as a senior official with the United States Department of Justice provides her with unique insight into the legal and regulatory challenges that businesses face and the constitutional and procedural implications arising when federal, state, and local governments seek to regulate the same conduct. As a former official, Esther understands how regulators work, what they look for, and how they expect businesses to respond to oversight. She advises companies and entrepreneurs on how to structure their businesses to ensure compliance and regulatory approval, and, if a regulatory inquiry arises, she negotiates with regulators to get them what they need, while minimizing the burden and expense to her clients.
Appeals and Critical Motions
Similarly, Esther's background as an appellate litigator and clerk gave her extensive knowledge of various substantive areas of law, an understanding of the practical implications of varying judicial philosophies, and keen insight on using civil procedure to win cases, particularly those with difficult facts. As a result, she has an interdisciplinary approach to the law and a knack for finding creative solutions for winning complex cases and winning them early. For example, Esther has used targeted dispositive motions on matters like standing, personal jurisdiction, and minimum pleading requirements to obtain dismissals of class actions before discovery. In one case, she used her understanding of constitutional law and states' rights to obtain a judgment that state law prohibited certifying a class on a state-law claim pending in federal court. In another, she negotiated a class action settlement early before discovery, enabling the client to avoid the costs of protracted litigation, and invasive discovery. Because of her skill in resolving cases, Esther is often brought into pending cases to find solutions that others have missed.
Counseling
Outside of litigation, Esther counsels clients on compliance and provides compliance reviews with gap analyses. She provides guidance on how to use technology to streamline compliance and to simplify business practices and how to ensure any existing uses of technology comply with current law. For instance, she has advised clients on using biometric data for identity verification, information security, background screening, customer service, and employee access. She has also advised entrepreneurs on innovative uses of blockchain technology to connect workers, suppliers, and customers securely and safely.
Esther enjoys finding simple solutions to complex problems, especially when that involves entrepreneurial clients and emerging technologies, and she relishes the challenge of winning the unwinnable case. She also likes predicting how small shifts in one area of law will create a ripple effect, and then identifying how to navigate those changes to her clients' benefit.
Pro Bono
Most of all, Esther is grateful for the opportunities she has to serve as pro bono counsel to nonprofits and to individuals unable to afford counsel. She's proud that Seyfarth supports its attorneys giving back to the community. Outside of work, Esther likes volunteering with local community organizations and traveling to any place she's never been before.
- JD, Notre Dame Law School
Summa cum laude
Dean Joseph O'Meara Award
Notre Dame Law Review, articles editor - BA, Pensacola Christian College
English & HistorySumma cum laude
Clerkships
- Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (The Honorable James L. Edmondson)
- District of Columbia
- Georgia
- Virginia
- US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
- US District Court, District of Columbia
- US District Court, Northern District of Georgia
- US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
- US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
- US District Court, Western District of Virginia
Related Services
- Appellate
- Background Checking & Drug Testing
- Class & Collective Actions
- Consumer Class Actions
- Commercial Litigation
- Employment
- Handbooks & Policy Development
- International Dispute Resolution
- Privacy & Cybersecurity
- Product Liability & Complex Tort
- Real Estate Litigation
- Talent Acquisition & Onboarding
- Trial
- Workplace Privacy & Biometrics
Related Key Industries
Blogs
- Defended international consumer reporting agency against numerous class actions complaints alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and/or related state laws. The trial courts in various jurisdictions granted dismissal of the complaints.
- Defended leading background screening company at trial against plaintiff alleging inaccurate, criminal records reporting and seeking nearly $10 million in damages. The trial court granted the defendant's motion for a directed verdict following the close of plaintiff's case at trial.
- Defended a large data company against a Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the claim without settlement after informal discovery and negotiations.
- Defended a hotel company against allegations that its government contract violated federal and local law due to the company's connections with high-ranking government officials. The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss.
- Defended global staffing company against a national class action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss, and the dismissal was affirmed on appeal.
- Defended beverage distributor against class action alleging background-screening violations, and negotiated an early class settlement without formal discovery.
- Defended a nationwide retailer against national class action alleging retailer failed to provide proper disclosures and adverse-action notices to consumers seeking employment. The named plaintiff reluctantly agreed to settle a much narrower class of consumers who had submitted employment applications to a particular business unit.
- Defended a financial services company against a national class action alleging that defendant mishandled consumer disputes. After negotiations but before substantial discovery, the plaintiff agreed to dismiss his class claims and settle on an individual basis.
Related News & Insights
-
Media Mentions
11/06/2024
Esther Slater McDonald Discusses Issue of Judge-Shopping in Legal Dive & Yahoo! Finance
-
Firm News
08/15/2024
220 Seyfarth Attorneys Chosen as Leaders in Their Fields by Best Lawyers in America 2025
-
Recognition
08/17/2023
210 Seyfarth Attorneys Chosen as Leaders in Their Fields by Best Lawyers in America 2024
-
Blog Post
Jun 9, 2023
Seyfarth Shaw’s Consumer Class Action and Product Liability Groups Receive Coveted Recognition from Legal 500
- Listed in Best Lawyers in America (Woodward/White Inc.) for Commercial Litigation (2021-2025)
- Recognized as a Recommended Attorney for Product liability, mass tort and class action - defense: consumer products (including tobacco), The Legal 500 (Legalese Ltd.) (2023-2024)
- American Bar Association
- Co-Author, "Consumer Financial Services Litigation," 2024 Commercial Litigation Outlook, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (February 2024)
- Co-Author, "New York Proposes Bill to Expand Business Interruption Coverage for COVID-19 Losses," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 1, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Business Interruption Coverage for COVID-19-Related Losses under Commercial First-Party Property Policies," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (March 20, 2020)
- Author, "Ninth Circuit Rules That Users, Not Consumers, Must Prove an Authorized Purpose for Obtaining a Consumer Report," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (November 21, 2019)
- Co-Author, "The Ninth Circuit Demands Simplicity: Background Check Disclosure Forms That Contain State-Law Notices or Improper Grammar Violate the FCRA," Management Alert, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 31, 2019)
- Co-Author, "For Civil Litigants, Confusion About the Effect of the Federal Government Shutdown," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 11, 2019)
- Co-Author, "CFPB Commotion Continues: Leandra English Resigns from CFPB Deputy Director Post," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 9, 2018)
- Co-Author, "An SDNY Dilemma: CFPB Held Unconstitutional Over Director Removal Provision," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 27, 2018)
- Co-Author, "Limiting Class Action Tolling: Supreme Court Rules That Filing A Class Action Does Not Toll The Limitations Period for Successive Class Actions," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 20, 2018)
- Co-Author, "States Moving To Fill Perceived Void in CFPB Enforcement," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 12, 2018)
- Co-Author, "Win Some, Lose Some: Trump Gets a Loss and a Win in the Fight to Control the CFPB," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (February 6, 2018)
- Co-Author, "Under New Leadership, CFPB No Longer Interested in Pushing the Envelope on Consumer Protection Laws," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 29, 2018)
- Co-Author, "D.C. Circuit to Hear Appeal in Fight to Control CFPB," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 17, 2018)
- Co-Author, "Another One Bites the Dust - the President Kills the CFPB Arbitration Rule," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (November 3, 2017)
- Co-Author, "Vice President Casts Deciding Vote to Overturn CFPB’s Proposed Arbitration Rule," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (October 26, 2017)
- Co-Author, "The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Summer Gift to Plaintiff’s Counsel," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 17, 2017)
- Co-Author, “The Positives and Negatives of the FCC’s Recent Omnibus Order on the TCPA,” Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 15, 2015)
- Co-Author, “Game Changer? The Supreme Court Agrees to Consider Standards for Certifying FLSA Collective Actions and State Law Class Actions,” Wage & Hour Litigation Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 9, 2015)
- “Supreme Court to Weigh in on Trial By Formula,” Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 8, 2015)
- “7th Circ. Says Random Sampling Works For CAFA, Not How,” Law360 (October 15, 2014)
- “Plaintiffs Seeking Remand Under CAFA Home State Exception Must Present Evidence of Putative Class Members’ Citizenship,” Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 24, 2014)
- Co-Author, “Supreme Court Receives Petitioner’s Brief and Eight Supporting Briefs In Significant Class Action Involving “Unsettled Question” of Whether Tolling Applies to a Statute of Repose,” Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 24, 2014)
- Co-Author, “Supreme Court Decision: Regulatory Takings,” Engage, Volume 6, Issue 1 (May 2005)
- “Patenting Human Life and the Rebirth of the Thirteenth Amendment,” Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 78, Issue 4 (2003)
- Co-Presenter, "Commercial Litigation Outlook: Part 1: Insights and Predictions for Litigation Trends in 2022," Webinar Series, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 12, 2022)
- Co-Presenter, "The CARES Act: Modifications to FCRA Duties," Webinar, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 27, 2021)
- Co-Presenter, "Insurance Coverage for Business Interruption Losses," Webinar, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 3, 2020)
- Co-Presenter, "Consero’s Corporate Litigation Executive Roundtable," Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 10, 2018)
- Speaker, "Investigate Consumer Reports: Litigation Trends and the Salary History Ban Movement," 2018 NAPBS Mid-Year Legislative & Regulatory Conference (Apr 16, 2018)
- Speaker, "End-User FAQs: What Do I Say When My Client Asks ________?," National Association of Professional Background Screeners’ Annual Conference (Sep 19, 2017)
- Speaker, "Conducting Legal and Compliant Background Checks," C4CM Events (May 9, 2017)
- Speaker, "Don't Be a Target: How to Respond to Disputes to Reduce Your Risk of Being Sued," National Association of Professional Background Screeners’ Mid-Year Legislative & Regulatory Conference (Mar 20, 2017)
- Speaker, "What Consumer Reporting Agencies Should Know About Ban the Box Legislation and Its Impact on the Adverse Action Process," National Association of Professional Background Screeners’ Annual Conference (Sep 20, 2016)
- Meals on Wheels Atlanta volunteer
- Notre Dame Club of Atlanta member
- Atlanta Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society executive board member
- Industry Practices Committee of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners co-chair
- Consumer Class Defense Blog co-editor
- CGL Reporter editorial board, 2014-2017