VinceSmolczynski
Counsel
Intellectual Property
vsmolczynski@seyfarth.com

Vince scales his IP and trade secret litigation practice to fit clients’ needs and business goals.
More About Vince
Clients turn to Vince for advice and strategy in the areas of complex intellectual property litigation, data privacy, cybersecurity, and related civil litigation. His experience spans a wide range of technical areas and industries, including pharmaceutical, chemical, biomedical devices, electronic devices, consumer goods, public utilities, hospitality, and food service, among others.
Vince focuses a large part of his practice on data protection issues, including counseling companies on data protection best practices and advising on domestic state level privacy and compliance work, including enacted US state privacy laws such as CCPA/CPRA, as well as state privacy laws in the legislative pipeline. He has defended numerous clients against California’s Invasion of Privacy Act claims; analyzed website-related disclosures; and assisted clients in developing and implementing the internal privacy processes and procedures that ensure clients are prepared to respond to data subject access requests, minimize data collection and retention, and provide appropriate notice of the collection and processing of personal information.
Vince also has significant experience in records and information management. He understands the essential record types that most companies maintain, and has extensive experience building compliant records and information management programs. In this respect, Vince has advised clients both small and large.
Vince is registered to practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office. He regularly counsels clients in connection with obtaining and protecting their IP assets, manages clients’ IP portfolios, and works with his clients to achieve their business objectives, whether through the initiation of infringement actions or staunch defense of the same in federal court.
Vince makes it a point to tailor his advice and strategy to the needs of the individual client, as he knows they vary depending upon where the client is in the growth curve. For example, he believes in picking up the telephone to get work done, but he realizes that different clients, particularly from different generations, work differently. He prides himself in being accessible and conducting his practices via all appropriate means. Seyfarth gives Vince the opportunity to work on the full scope and range of representation, from large scale litigation to individualized counseling.
Vince focuses a large part of his practice on data protection issues, including counseling companies on data protection best practices and advising on domestic state level privacy and compliance work, including enacted US state privacy laws such as CCPA/CPRA, as well as state privacy laws in the legislative pipeline. He has defended numerous clients against California’s Invasion of Privacy Act claims; analyzed website-related disclosures; and assisted clients in developing and implementing the internal privacy processes and procedures that ensure clients are prepared to respond to data subject access requests, minimize data collection and retention, and provide appropriate notice of the collection and processing of personal information.
Vince also has significant experience in records and information management. He understands the essential record types that most companies maintain, and has extensive experience building compliant records and information management programs. In this respect, Vince has advised clients both small and large.
Vince is registered to practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office. He regularly counsels clients in connection with obtaining and protecting their IP assets, manages clients’ IP portfolios, and works with his clients to achieve their business objectives, whether through the initiation of infringement actions or staunch defense of the same in federal court.
Vince makes it a point to tailor his advice and strategy to the needs of the individual client, as he knows they vary depending upon where the client is in the growth curve. For example, he believes in picking up the telephone to get work done, but he realizes that different clients, particularly from different generations, work differently. He prides himself in being accessible and conducting his practices via all appropriate means. Seyfarth gives Vince the opportunity to work on the full scope and range of representation, from large scale litigation to individualized counseling.
- JD, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Chicago-Kent Moot Court Honor Society - BA, University of Delaware
Biology
- Illinois
- North Carolina
- US Supreme Court
- US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
- US District Court, District of Colorado
- US District Court, Northern District of Illinois
- US District Court, Western District of Michigan
Related News & Insights
-
Blog Post
Oct 25, 2024
Tracking Users’ Web Browsing Activity Does Not Constitute Illegal Wiretapping under Massachusetts Law
-
Webinar Recording
Sep 10, 2024
Webinar Recording: California Website Owners: Key Updates on Cookie Banners, Arbitration, and Privacy Compliance
-
Blog Post
Dec 5, 2023
CPPA Considers Next Set of CPRA Regulations Covering Cybersecurity Audits and Risk Assessments
-
Speaking Engagement
Oct 21, 2023
Vince Smolczynski to Moderate Ethics Panel at the American Intellectual Property Law Association’s Annual Meeting
- Illinois State Bar Association
- Co-Author, "Tracking Users’ Web Browsing Activity Does Not Constitute Illegal Wiretapping under Massachusetts Law," Carpe Datum Law Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (October 25, 2024)
- Co-Author, "Seyfarth Shaw IP Team Files Supreme Court Amici Brief in Trade Dress Case," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (October 28, 2021)
- Co-Author, "FDA Issues Emergency Use Authorization for COVID-19 Vaccine," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 14, 2020)
- Contributor, Illinois Corporate Practice and Forms: The Seyfarth Shaw Manual (2017–2020)
- Co-Author, "FDA Aggressively Monitoring and Pursuing Advertisements Touting Treatments, Preventions and Cures for COVID-19," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 28, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Chinese Manufacturers of Personal Protective Equipment Gave False U.S. Agent Information to Food and Drug Administration," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 23, 2020)
- Co-Author, "FDA Authorizes Synthetic Nasal Swab to Increase COVID-19 Testing," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 22, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Can COVID-19 Provide a Sufficient Basis for Claiming Excusable Nonuse of a Trademark?" Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (March 26, 2020)
- Author, "FDA Issues New Guidance for IND Sponsors," BioLoquitur Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 30, 2018)
- Author, "FDA Announces New Digital Health Policy Documents to Encourage Efficient Development of Digital Health Tools," BioLoquitur Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 18, 2017)
- Author, "December 31, 2017: Last Day To Designate DMCA Agent Or Lose Safe Harbor Eligibility," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 13, 2017)
- Co-Contributor, llinois Corporate Practice and Forms: The Seyfarth Shaw Manual, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (August 14, 2017)
- Co-Author, "Once Again, the Purpose of the Invention Determines Patent-Eligibility," PTAB Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 19, 2016)
- Co-Author, "PTAB Expands Definition of 'Covered Business Method'," IP Frontline (October 21, 2015)
- Co-Author, "PTAB Expands Definition of 'Covered Business Method'," PTAB Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 30, 2015)
- Co-Author, "Harm Presumed No More: Trademark Owners Must Prove Irreparable Harm For Any Injunction In The Ninth Circuit," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 17, 2013)
- Co-Author, "Win-Win Ruling Protects Coloring the 'Sole' of the Fashion Industry," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 7, 2012)
- "A Sowing Lesson: Supreme Court Maintains Strong Patent Protection For Self-Replicating Technology," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 14, 2013)
- "Willful Patent Filing: A Criminal Procedure to Protect Traditional Knowledge," 85(3) Chicago-Kent Law Review 1171 (2010)
Vince scales his IP and trade secret litigation practice to fit clients’ needs and business goals.
More About Vince
Clients turn to Vince for advice and strategy in the areas of complex intellectual property litigation, data privacy, cybersecurity, and related civil litigation. His experience spans a wide range of technical areas and industries, including pharmaceutical, chemical, biomedical devices, electronic devices, consumer goods, public utilities, hospitality, and food service, among others.
Vince focuses a large part of his practice on data protection issues, including counseling companies on data protection best practices and advising on domestic state level privacy and compliance work, including enacted US state privacy laws such as CCPA/CPRA, as well as state privacy laws in the legislative pipeline. He has defended numerous clients against California’s Invasion of Privacy Act claims; analyzed website-related disclosures; and assisted clients in developing and implementing the internal privacy processes and procedures that ensure clients are prepared to respond to data subject access requests, minimize data collection and retention, and provide appropriate notice of the collection and processing of personal information.
Vince also has significant experience in records and information management. He understands the essential record types that most companies maintain, and has extensive experience building compliant records and information management programs. In this respect, Vince has advised clients both small and large.
Vince is registered to practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office. He regularly counsels clients in connection with obtaining and protecting their IP assets, manages clients’ IP portfolios, and works with his clients to achieve their business objectives, whether through the initiation of infringement actions or staunch defense of the same in federal court.
Vince makes it a point to tailor his advice and strategy to the needs of the individual client, as he knows they vary depending upon where the client is in the growth curve. For example, he believes in picking up the telephone to get work done, but he realizes that different clients, particularly from different generations, work differently. He prides himself in being accessible and conducting his practices via all appropriate means. Seyfarth gives Vince the opportunity to work on the full scope and range of representation, from large scale litigation to individualized counseling.
Vince focuses a large part of his practice on data protection issues, including counseling companies on data protection best practices and advising on domestic state level privacy and compliance work, including enacted US state privacy laws such as CCPA/CPRA, as well as state privacy laws in the legislative pipeline. He has defended numerous clients against California’s Invasion of Privacy Act claims; analyzed website-related disclosures; and assisted clients in developing and implementing the internal privacy processes and procedures that ensure clients are prepared to respond to data subject access requests, minimize data collection and retention, and provide appropriate notice of the collection and processing of personal information.
Vince also has significant experience in records and information management. He understands the essential record types that most companies maintain, and has extensive experience building compliant records and information management programs. In this respect, Vince has advised clients both small and large.
Vince is registered to practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office. He regularly counsels clients in connection with obtaining and protecting their IP assets, manages clients’ IP portfolios, and works with his clients to achieve their business objectives, whether through the initiation of infringement actions or staunch defense of the same in federal court.
Vince makes it a point to tailor his advice and strategy to the needs of the individual client, as he knows they vary depending upon where the client is in the growth curve. For example, he believes in picking up the telephone to get work done, but he realizes that different clients, particularly from different generations, work differently. He prides himself in being accessible and conducting his practices via all appropriate means. Seyfarth gives Vince the opportunity to work on the full scope and range of representation, from large scale litigation to individualized counseling.
- JD, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Chicago-Kent Moot Court Honor Society - BA, University of Delaware
Biology
- Illinois
- North Carolina
- US Supreme Court
- US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
- US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
- US District Court, District of Colorado
- US District Court, Northern District of Illinois
- US District Court, Western District of Michigan
Related News & Insights
-
Blog Post
Oct 25, 2024
Tracking Users’ Web Browsing Activity Does Not Constitute Illegal Wiretapping under Massachusetts Law
-
Webinar Recording
Sep 10, 2024
Webinar Recording: California Website Owners: Key Updates on Cookie Banners, Arbitration, and Privacy Compliance
-
Blog Post
Dec 5, 2023
CPPA Considers Next Set of CPRA Regulations Covering Cybersecurity Audits and Risk Assessments
-
Speaking Engagement
Oct 21, 2023
Vince Smolczynski to Moderate Ethics Panel at the American Intellectual Property Law Association’s Annual Meeting
- Illinois State Bar Association
- Co-Author, "Tracking Users’ Web Browsing Activity Does Not Constitute Illegal Wiretapping under Massachusetts Law," Carpe Datum Law Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (October 25, 2024)
- Co-Author, "Seyfarth Shaw IP Team Files Supreme Court Amici Brief in Trade Dress Case," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (October 28, 2021)
- Co-Author, "FDA Issues Emergency Use Authorization for COVID-19 Vaccine," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 14, 2020)
- Contributor, Illinois Corporate Practice and Forms: The Seyfarth Shaw Manual (2017–2020)
- Co-Author, "FDA Aggressively Monitoring and Pursuing Advertisements Touting Treatments, Preventions and Cures for COVID-19," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 28, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Chinese Manufacturers of Personal Protective Equipment Gave False U.S. Agent Information to Food and Drug Administration," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 23, 2020)
- Co-Author, "FDA Authorizes Synthetic Nasal Swab to Increase COVID-19 Testing," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 22, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Can COVID-19 Provide a Sufficient Basis for Claiming Excusable Nonuse of a Trademark?" Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (March 26, 2020)
- Author, "FDA Issues New Guidance for IND Sponsors," BioLoquitur Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 30, 2018)
- Author, "FDA Announces New Digital Health Policy Documents to Encourage Efficient Development of Digital Health Tools," BioLoquitur Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 18, 2017)
- Author, "December 31, 2017: Last Day To Designate DMCA Agent Or Lose Safe Harbor Eligibility," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 13, 2017)
- Co-Contributor, llinois Corporate Practice and Forms: The Seyfarth Shaw Manual, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (August 14, 2017)
- Co-Author, "Once Again, the Purpose of the Invention Determines Patent-Eligibility," PTAB Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (January 19, 2016)
- Co-Author, "PTAB Expands Definition of 'Covered Business Method'," IP Frontline (October 21, 2015)
- Co-Author, "PTAB Expands Definition of 'Covered Business Method'," PTAB Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 30, 2015)
- Co-Author, "Harm Presumed No More: Trademark Owners Must Prove Irreparable Harm For Any Injunction In The Ninth Circuit," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 17, 2013)
- Co-Author, "Win-Win Ruling Protects Coloring the 'Sole' of the Fashion Industry," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 7, 2012)
- "A Sowing Lesson: Supreme Court Maintains Strong Patent Protection For Self-Replicating Technology," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 14, 2013)
- "Willful Patent Filing: A Criminal Procedure to Protect Traditional Knowledge," 85(3) Chicago-Kent Law Review 1171 (2010)