Joseph J.Orzano
Partner
Product Liability & Complex Tort
jorzano@seyfarth.com
Joe partners with clients to effectively communicate their brands to consumers, while navigating complex regulatory requirements and litigation risk. Joe also helps clients resolve disputes related to advertising and labeling when they arise.
More About Joe
Most businesses today engage in some form of brand marketing, and the accompanying advertising and labeling present both opportunities and risks. Joe is the co-chair of the nationwide Product Liability practice group and co-chair of the Advertising & Marketing group. Clients look to Joe for sound, practical advice on their marketing and product labeling so that they can effectively communicate their brands, while ensuring compliance and managing the risk of disputes. Joe also helps clients resolve disputes that arise when competitors or consumers challenge advertising or labeling.
Joe has extensive experience defending consumer class actions involving claims of false advertising and challenges to product labeling. He has also represented clients in competitor advertising disputes, including in litigation and before the National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs, Inc. Joe draws on his litigation experience to provide sound, practical advice to companies regarding proposed advertising and product labeling.
Joe has litigated claims that invoke the consumer protection statutes of multiple jurisdictions, including those frequently asserted in class actions in California, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Missouri, Illinois, and Florida. Joe has particularly deep knowledge of California's Unfair Competition Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and False Advertising Law.
Joe also has expansive knowledge in the area of class certification requirements, including evolving case law in the false advertising consumer class action context. He has litigated consumer class actions filed in state and federal courts around the country, and has litigated related class actions centralized for pretrial purposes by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Joe has advised clients on a variety of complex statutory and regulatory schemes, particularly on the food labeling and recall provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, organic certification and labeling requirements under the US Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program, labeling requirements of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act and Wool Products Labeling Act, requirements of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, consumer disclosure and warranty requirements of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and the warning requirements of California's Proposition 65. Additionally, he advises clients on the substantiation requirements for marketing claims.
Joe focuses on developing solutions tailored to the needs of the particular client and situation. He assists clients involved in disputes concerning adverting and product labeling, but also helps clients avoid future disputes by providing tools and advice to guide future practices, such as helping them build their compliance strategies, preparing guidance materials, and developing and delivering training to marketing team members.
Joe enjoys helping companies communicate their brands to consumers, while navigating complex and often ambiguous legal requirements. When challenged, he enjoys driving successful outcomes in disputes through tailored approaches to litigation, depending on the circumstances and needs of the client.
Joe has extensive experience defending consumer class actions involving claims of false advertising and challenges to product labeling. He has also represented clients in competitor advertising disputes, including in litigation and before the National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs, Inc. Joe draws on his litigation experience to provide sound, practical advice to companies regarding proposed advertising and product labeling.
Joe has litigated claims that invoke the consumer protection statutes of multiple jurisdictions, including those frequently asserted in class actions in California, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Missouri, Illinois, and Florida. Joe has particularly deep knowledge of California's Unfair Competition Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and False Advertising Law.
Joe also has expansive knowledge in the area of class certification requirements, including evolving case law in the false advertising consumer class action context. He has litigated consumer class actions filed in state and federal courts around the country, and has litigated related class actions centralized for pretrial purposes by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Joe has advised clients on a variety of complex statutory and regulatory schemes, particularly on the food labeling and recall provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, organic certification and labeling requirements under the US Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program, labeling requirements of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act and Wool Products Labeling Act, requirements of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, consumer disclosure and warranty requirements of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and the warning requirements of California's Proposition 65. Additionally, he advises clients on the substantiation requirements for marketing claims.
Joe focuses on developing solutions tailored to the needs of the particular client and situation. He assists clients involved in disputes concerning adverting and product labeling, but also helps clients avoid future disputes by providing tools and advice to guide future practices, such as helping them build their compliance strategies, preparing guidance materials, and developing and delivering training to marketing team members.
Joe enjoys helping companies communicate their brands to consumers, while navigating complex and often ambiguous legal requirements. When challenged, he enjoys driving successful outcomes in disputes through tailored approaches to litigation, depending on the circumstances and needs of the client.
- JD, The George Washington University Law School
- BA, Georgetown University
- California
- Massachusetts
- US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
- US District Court, Central District of California
- US District Court, Eastern District of California
- US District Court, Northern District of California
- US District Court, District of Massachusetts
Related Services
Blogs
Related News & Insights
-
Speaking Engagement
Nov 11, 2024
Seyfarth to Sponsor and Present at 2024 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference
-
Legal Update
Feb 15, 2024
Now Available! 2024 Commercial Litigation Outlook
-
Speaking Engagement
Nov 15, 2023
Seyfarth to Sponsor and Present at 2023 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference
-
Blog Post
Jun 9, 2023
Seyfarth Shaw’s Consumer Class Action and Product Liability Groups Receive Coveted Recognition from Legal 500
- Recognized as a Recommended Attorney for Product liability, mass tort and class action - defense: consumer products (including tobacco), The Legal 500 (Legalese Ltd.) (2022-2024)
- Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers
- Co-Author, "Consumer Class Actions," 2024 Commercial Litigation Outlook, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (February 2024)
- Co-Author, "FTC Requests Public Comments on Potential Updates to the 'Green Guides'," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 22, 2022)
- Co-Author, "FTC Receives Flurry Of Comments As Dealers And Others Oppose New Car Dealer Rule," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 26, 2022)
- Co-Author, "Full Steam Ahead: FTC Declines To Extend Public Comment Period For New Car Dealer Rule," Legal Update: Seyfarth's Future of Automotive Series, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (August 24, 2022)
- Co-Author, "FTC Begins Process To Adopt Rules For New Car Dealer Advertising And Sales," Legal Update: Seyfarth's Future of Automotive Series, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 11, 2022)
- Co-Author, "Causation Defenses to Premises Liability Claims Involving Alleged Exposure to COVID-19," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 4, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Potential Liability for Businesses Under the Public Nuisance Doctrine," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 11, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Use of Public Health Guidance to Mitigate Risk of Premises Liability to Customers Based on Exposure to COVID-19," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 8, 2020)
- Co-Author, "FDA Issues Nutrition-Labeling Guidance in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 15, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Seventh Circuit Limits Scope of Federal Trade Commission’s Enforcement Authority," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 3, 2019); Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 10, 2019)
- Co-Author, "Implementation Date For The USDA’s National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 2, 2019)
- Co-Author, "The USDA’s Proposed National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 5, 2018)
- Co-Author, "FDA Announces Initiative to Redefine “Healthy” Claim for Food Labeling," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (October 17, 2016)
- Co-Author, "Ephemeral Letters of Transit: Responding to Government Requests for Electronically Stored Information," American Bar Association-Section of Litigation, Committee on Criminal Litigation (Winter 2007)
- "Advertising Litigation Developments," Masters of Advertising Law Conference, Hollywood FL (November 10, 2022)
- Co-Presenter, "California Proposition 65: From Concept to Implementation—New Warning Regulations Take Effect," Webinar, presented by Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 25, 2018)
- "California Proposition 65: New Regulations Companies Need To Know Before 2018," Webinar, presented by Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 15, 2017)
Joe partners with clients to effectively communicate their brands to consumers, while navigating complex regulatory requirements and litigation risk. Joe also helps clients resolve disputes related to advertising and labeling when they arise.
More About Joe
Most businesses today engage in some form of brand marketing, and the accompanying advertising and labeling present both opportunities and risks. Joe is the co-chair of the nationwide Product Liability practice group and co-chair of the Advertising & Marketing group. Clients look to Joe for sound, practical advice on their marketing and product labeling so that they can effectively communicate their brands, while ensuring compliance and managing the risk of disputes. Joe also helps clients resolve disputes that arise when competitors or consumers challenge advertising or labeling.
Joe has extensive experience defending consumer class actions involving claims of false advertising and challenges to product labeling. He has also represented clients in competitor advertising disputes, including in litigation and before the National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs, Inc. Joe draws on his litigation experience to provide sound, practical advice to companies regarding proposed advertising and product labeling.
Joe has litigated claims that invoke the consumer protection statutes of multiple jurisdictions, including those frequently asserted in class actions in California, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Missouri, Illinois, and Florida. Joe has particularly deep knowledge of California's Unfair Competition Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and False Advertising Law.
Joe also has expansive knowledge in the area of class certification requirements, including evolving case law in the false advertising consumer class action context. He has litigated consumer class actions filed in state and federal courts around the country, and has litigated related class actions centralized for pretrial purposes by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Joe has advised clients on a variety of complex statutory and regulatory schemes, particularly on the food labeling and recall provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, organic certification and labeling requirements under the US Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program, labeling requirements of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act and Wool Products Labeling Act, requirements of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, consumer disclosure and warranty requirements of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and the warning requirements of California's Proposition 65. Additionally, he advises clients on the substantiation requirements for marketing claims.
Joe focuses on developing solutions tailored to the needs of the particular client and situation. He assists clients involved in disputes concerning adverting and product labeling, but also helps clients avoid future disputes by providing tools and advice to guide future practices, such as helping them build their compliance strategies, preparing guidance materials, and developing and delivering training to marketing team members.
Joe enjoys helping companies communicate their brands to consumers, while navigating complex and often ambiguous legal requirements. When challenged, he enjoys driving successful outcomes in disputes through tailored approaches to litigation, depending on the circumstances and needs of the client.
Joe has extensive experience defending consumer class actions involving claims of false advertising and challenges to product labeling. He has also represented clients in competitor advertising disputes, including in litigation and before the National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs, Inc. Joe draws on his litigation experience to provide sound, practical advice to companies regarding proposed advertising and product labeling.
Joe has litigated claims that invoke the consumer protection statutes of multiple jurisdictions, including those frequently asserted in class actions in California, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Missouri, Illinois, and Florida. Joe has particularly deep knowledge of California's Unfair Competition Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and False Advertising Law.
Joe also has expansive knowledge in the area of class certification requirements, including evolving case law in the false advertising consumer class action context. He has litigated consumer class actions filed in state and federal courts around the country, and has litigated related class actions centralized for pretrial purposes by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Joe has advised clients on a variety of complex statutory and regulatory schemes, particularly on the food labeling and recall provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, organic certification and labeling requirements under the US Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program, labeling requirements of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act and Wool Products Labeling Act, requirements of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, consumer disclosure and warranty requirements of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and the warning requirements of California's Proposition 65. Additionally, he advises clients on the substantiation requirements for marketing claims.
Joe focuses on developing solutions tailored to the needs of the particular client and situation. He assists clients involved in disputes concerning adverting and product labeling, but also helps clients avoid future disputes by providing tools and advice to guide future practices, such as helping them build their compliance strategies, preparing guidance materials, and developing and delivering training to marketing team members.
Joe enjoys helping companies communicate their brands to consumers, while navigating complex and often ambiguous legal requirements. When challenged, he enjoys driving successful outcomes in disputes through tailored approaches to litigation, depending on the circumstances and needs of the client.
- JD, The George Washington University Law School
- BA, Georgetown University
- California
- Massachusetts
- US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
- US District Court, Central District of California
- US District Court, Eastern District of California
- US District Court, Northern District of California
- US District Court, District of Massachusetts
Related Services
Blogs
Related News & Insights
-
Speaking Engagement
Nov 11, 2024
Seyfarth to Sponsor and Present at 2024 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference
-
Legal Update
Feb 15, 2024
Now Available! 2024 Commercial Litigation Outlook
-
Speaking Engagement
Nov 15, 2023
Seyfarth to Sponsor and Present at 2023 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference
-
Blog Post
Jun 9, 2023
Seyfarth Shaw’s Consumer Class Action and Product Liability Groups Receive Coveted Recognition from Legal 500
- Recognized as a Recommended Attorney for Product liability, mass tort and class action - defense: consumer products (including tobacco), The Legal 500 (Legalese Ltd.) (2022-2024)
- Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers
- Co-Author, "Consumer Class Actions," 2024 Commercial Litigation Outlook, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (February 2024)
- Co-Author, "FTC Requests Public Comments on Potential Updates to the 'Green Guides'," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (December 22, 2022)
- Co-Author, "FTC Receives Flurry Of Comments As Dealers And Others Oppose New Car Dealer Rule," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 26, 2022)
- Co-Author, "Full Steam Ahead: FTC Declines To Extend Public Comment Period For New Car Dealer Rule," Legal Update: Seyfarth's Future of Automotive Series, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (August 24, 2022)
- Co-Author, "FTC Begins Process To Adopt Rules For New Car Dealer Advertising And Sales," Legal Update: Seyfarth's Future of Automotive Series, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (July 11, 2022)
- Co-Author, "Causation Defenses to Premises Liability Claims Involving Alleged Exposure to COVID-19," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 4, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Potential Liability for Businesses Under the Public Nuisance Doctrine," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 11, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Use of Public Health Guidance to Mitigate Risk of Premises Liability to Customers Based on Exposure to COVID-19," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 8, 2020)
- Co-Author, "FDA Issues Nutrition-Labeling Guidance in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (April 15, 2020)
- Co-Author, "Seventh Circuit Limits Scope of Federal Trade Commission’s Enforcement Authority," Legal Update, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 3, 2019); Consumer Class Defense Blog, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 10, 2019)
- Co-Author, "Implementation Date For The USDA’s National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (May 2, 2019)
- Co-Author, "The USDA’s Proposed National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 5, 2018)
- Co-Author, "FDA Announces Initiative to Redefine “Healthy” Claim for Food Labeling," One Minute Memo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP (October 17, 2016)
- Co-Author, "Ephemeral Letters of Transit: Responding to Government Requests for Electronically Stored Information," American Bar Association-Section of Litigation, Committee on Criminal Litigation (Winter 2007)
- "Advertising Litigation Developments," Masters of Advertising Law Conference, Hollywood FL (November 10, 2022)
- Co-Presenter, "California Proposition 65: From Concept to Implementation—New Warning Regulations Take Effect," Webinar, presented by Seyfarth Shaw LLP (September 25, 2018)
- "California Proposition 65: New Regulations Companies Need To Know Before 2018," Webinar, presented by Seyfarth Shaw LLP (June 15, 2017)