Intellectual Property Litigation
Intellectual property assets are valuable—but only if they are vigilantly protected. Whether the asset at stake is a patent, trademark, copyright, or trade secret, successfully defending a company’s intellectual property can mean the difference between future profitability and the end of the line.
HOW WE HELP
Our IP Litigation attorneys combine extensive technical backgrounds with considerable courtroom skills to ensure clients have the best possible outcome at this high-stakes moment in their business life cycle. Our team’s deep experience representing plaintiffs and defendants allows clients to make informed decisions that will put the business on the best path once a dispute has been resolved. Our wide-ranging industry knowledge includes luxury goods, food and beverage, automotive, agriculture, manufacturing, technology and software, and pharmaceuticals.
OUR SERVICES
Trademark & Copyright Litigation. We protect the marks and works of multinational corporations and cutting-edge startups, in the US and abroad, from applications for emergency injunctive relief through trials and appeals. Our IP Litigation team helps protect clients’ rights by prosecuting and defending infringement actions and unfair competition matters. Our attorneys represent clients at the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), the Copyright Office, the federal courts, and state court as well. We resolve all forms of trademark and copyright disputes, including coordination of criminal proceedings where appropriate, and regularly advocate for expedited proceedings to quickly obtain temporary restraining orders, including injunctions and impoundment orders for pirated works.
Patent Litigation. Our IP Litigation team has a track record of success handling complex patent cases and administrative proceedings. We regularly appear before juries and judges in federal court, at the USPTO, and at the International Trade Commission. Our registered patent attorneys understand the complexities involved in all stages of a patent dispute, and stand ready to defend and enforce clients’ rights. When it is in a company’s best interest to avoid trial, our team deploys innovative strategies for negotiating resolutions and settlements.
Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud, and Non-Competes. Confidential information—including trade secrets—in the wrong hands can result in severely compromising a company’s competitive advantage and devastating monetary damage. Our team is ready to prosecute and defend individuals and companies accused of stealing, using, or disclosing another party’s proprietary information—whether the allegations are unjust, or the client made a mistake and needs help resolving the dispute.
THE SEYFARTH EXPERIENCE
While intellectual property is the most unique asset of any company, it does not exist in a vacuum. Our IP litigators draw on the business-solution experience of Seyfarth’s entire platform to assemble the right mix of Labor & Employment, Tax, and International colleagues who can provide counsel on the implications of each decision along the path of litigation.
Complementing our team’s strong technical background, the IP Litigation group includes former prosecutors, seasoned trial attorneys, litigators, many of whom are well-versed in computer forensics and eDiscovery issues.
- Represent a manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products in a trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition case against a competitor retail company and mattress store chain, and other defendants. The competitor was accused of selling mattress and bedding products that infringe in their appearance, presentation, and advertisements to our client’s trademarks and trade dress. The matter settled after competitor filed for bankruptcy.
- Represent a Japanese multinational automotive manufacture against an authorized car dealer whose use of client’s famous trademark and logo at an unauthorized location on Long Island is infringing. After the dealer refused to stop its infringement at the new location, we sued in the US District Court. It alleged unfair competition in violation of the federal Lanham Act and New York law and breach of contract. We also sought a temporary restraining order for our client to stop the dealer’s unauthorized and infringing conduct.
- Represented a US manufacturer of heavy, agricultural, construction, and forestry machinery, challenging a competitor’s numerous false and misleading advertising claims before the Better Business Bureau’s National Advertising Division (NAD). The NAD determined that the competitor should modify or discontinue a substantial majority of the challenged claims, including its #1 selling claims, best warranty claims, superior performance claims, and best value claims. The competitor appealed to the National Advertising Review Board, which affirmed and broadened the NAD findings.
- Defended a large global innovator and manufacturer of gaming systems in a complex patent infringement suit seeking in excess of $200 million. After a jury trial, a bench trial, and two successful appeals to the Federal Circuit, the company was found not to infringe.
- Represented a large American telecommunications company in a patent infringement suit involving cellular technology. After trying the case to a jury, the jury reached a complete defense verdict shielding the company from potential damages of $400 million.
- Represented a French company enforcing its patent and trade dress rights. The jury found that the defendant was liable on all counts and awarded the company all its requested compensatory damages as well as significant punitive damages.
- Represent an American multinational financial services corporation in a patent infringement lawsuit involving digital rights management and verification technology. We also represented the client in three recent petitions for inter partes review at the USPTO, relating to the pending litigation.
- Represented a defendant, a global leader in designing, manufacturing, and marketing innovative food and beverage solutions, in four separate patent infringement lawsuits brought by its competitor. All of the suits were stayed pending inter partes review proceedings in the USPTO. The PTAB invalidated all of the claims for which review was sought in three of the four cases.
- Lead US enforcement counsel for a popular global fashion-wear company, and work with a worldwide team of outside counsel on various enforcement matters as directed by lead in-house counsel in Amsterdam. In that effort, we pursue and close down infringers, counterfeiters, domain name squatters, and others seeking to improperly take advantage of the client’s high-end reputation and valuable trademark portfolio.
- Represent an American multinational financial services corporation in a patent infringement lawsuit involving digital rights management and verification technology. We also represented the client in three recent petitions for inter partes review at the USPTO, relating to the pending litigation.
Related Trends
Related News & Insights
-
Blog Post
12/17/2024
Can You Protect the “Clean Girl” Aesthetic? Influencers Battle over Copyrights and Likeness Rights
-
Blog Post
12/12/2024
What’s in a (Band) Name? Why Bands Need Trademark Registrations
-
Blog Post
11/26/2024
A Vegetarian’s Thanksgiving: How a Patent and a Restriction Requirement Highlight Inclusivity
-
Blog Post
11/21/2024
Get Your Wallets Ready – The Price of Patents Are Going Up!
Recognition
-
Recognition
11/07/2024
Seyfarth Extends Rankings in ‘2025 Best Law Firms’ by Best Lawyers
-
Recognition
10/03/2024
Seyfarth Cited in World Intellectual Property Review’s 2024 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
-
Recognition
06/11/2024
Three Seyfarth Lawyers and the Firm Earn Recommended Status from IAM Patent 1000
-
Recognition
02/07/2024
Seyfarth Achieves National Ranking in World Trademark Review 1000 for 2024
Intellectual property assets are valuable—but only if they are vigilantly protected. Whether the asset at stake is a patent, trademark, copyright, or trade secret, successfully defending a company’s intellectual property can mean the difference between future profitability and the end of the line.
HOW WE HELP
Our IP Litigation attorneys combine extensive technical backgrounds with considerable courtroom skills to ensure clients have the best possible outcome at this high-stakes moment in their business life cycle. Our team’s deep experience representing plaintiffs and defendants allows clients to make informed decisions that will put the business on the best path once a dispute has been resolved. Our wide-ranging industry knowledge includes luxury goods, food and beverage, automotive, agriculture, manufacturing, technology and software, and pharmaceuticals.
OUR SERVICES
Trademark & Copyright Litigation. We protect the marks and works of multinational corporations and cutting-edge startups, in the US and abroad, from applications for emergency injunctive relief through trials and appeals. Our IP Litigation team helps protect clients’ rights by prosecuting and defending infringement actions and unfair competition matters. Our attorneys represent clients at the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), the Copyright Office, the federal courts, and state court as well. We resolve all forms of trademark and copyright disputes, including coordination of criminal proceedings where appropriate, and regularly advocate for expedited proceedings to quickly obtain temporary restraining orders, including injunctions and impoundment orders for pirated works.
Patent Litigation. Our IP Litigation team has a track record of success handling complex patent cases and administrative proceedings. We regularly appear before juries and judges in federal court, at the USPTO, and at the International Trade Commission. Our registered patent attorneys understand the complexities involved in all stages of a patent dispute, and stand ready to defend and enforce clients’ rights. When it is in a company’s best interest to avoid trial, our team deploys innovative strategies for negotiating resolutions and settlements.
Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud, and Non-Competes. Confidential information—including trade secrets—in the wrong hands can result in severely compromising a company’s competitive advantage and devastating monetary damage. Our team is ready to prosecute and defend individuals and companies accused of stealing, using, or disclosing another party’s proprietary information—whether the allegations are unjust, or the client made a mistake and needs help resolving the dispute.
THE SEYFARTH EXPERIENCE
While intellectual property is the most unique asset of any company, it does not exist in a vacuum. Our IP litigators draw on the business-solution experience of Seyfarth’s entire platform to assemble the right mix of Labor & Employment, Tax, and International colleagues who can provide counsel on the implications of each decision along the path of litigation.
Complementing our team’s strong technical background, the IP Litigation group includes former prosecutors, seasoned trial attorneys, litigators, many of whom are well-versed in computer forensics and eDiscovery issues.
Blogs
- Represent a manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products in a trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition case against a competitor retail company and mattress store chain, and other defendants. The competitor was accused of selling mattress and bedding products that infringe in their appearance, presentation, and advertisements to our client’s trademarks and trade dress. The matter settled after competitor filed for bankruptcy.
- Represent a Japanese multinational automotive manufacture against an authorized car dealer whose use of client’s famous trademark and logo at an unauthorized location on Long Island is infringing. After the dealer refused to stop its infringement at the new location, we sued in the US District Court. It alleged unfair competition in violation of the federal Lanham Act and New York law and breach of contract. We also sought a temporary restraining order for our client to stop the dealer’s unauthorized and infringing conduct.
- Represented a US manufacturer of heavy, agricultural, construction, and forestry machinery, challenging a competitor’s numerous false and misleading advertising claims before the Better Business Bureau’s National Advertising Division (NAD). The NAD determined that the competitor should modify or discontinue a substantial majority of the challenged claims, including its #1 selling claims, best warranty claims, superior performance claims, and best value claims. The competitor appealed to the National Advertising Review Board, which affirmed and broadened the NAD findings.
- Defended a large global innovator and manufacturer of gaming systems in a complex patent infringement suit seeking in excess of $200 million. After a jury trial, a bench trial, and two successful appeals to the Federal Circuit, the company was found not to infringe.
- Represented a large American telecommunications company in a patent infringement suit involving cellular technology. After trying the case to a jury, the jury reached a complete defense verdict shielding the company from potential damages of $400 million.
- Represented a French company enforcing its patent and trade dress rights. The jury found that the defendant was liable on all counts and awarded the company all its requested compensatory damages as well as significant punitive damages.
- Represent an American multinational financial services corporation in a patent infringement lawsuit involving digital rights management and verification technology. We also represented the client in three recent petitions for inter partes review at the USPTO, relating to the pending litigation.
- Represented a defendant, a global leader in designing, manufacturing, and marketing innovative food and beverage solutions, in four separate patent infringement lawsuits brought by its competitor. All of the suits were stayed pending inter partes review proceedings in the USPTO. The PTAB invalidated all of the claims for which review was sought in three of the four cases.
- Lead US enforcement counsel for a popular global fashion-wear company, and work with a worldwide team of outside counsel on various enforcement matters as directed by lead in-house counsel in Amsterdam. In that effort, we pursue and close down infringers, counterfeiters, domain name squatters, and others seeking to improperly take advantage of the client’s high-end reputation and valuable trademark portfolio.
- Represent an American multinational financial services corporation in a patent infringement lawsuit involving digital rights management and verification technology. We also represented the client in three recent petitions for inter partes review at the USPTO, relating to the pending litigation.
Related Trends
Related News & Insights
-
Blog Post
12/17/2024
Can You Protect the “Clean Girl” Aesthetic? Influencers Battle over Copyrights and Likeness Rights
-
Blog Post
12/12/2024
What’s in a (Band) Name? Why Bands Need Trademark Registrations
-
Blog Post
11/26/2024
A Vegetarian’s Thanksgiving: How a Patent and a Restriction Requirement Highlight Inclusivity
-
Blog Post
11/21/2024
Get Your Wallets Ready – The Price of Patents Are Going Up!
Recognition
-
Recognition
11/07/2024
Seyfarth Extends Rankings in ‘2025 Best Law Firms’ by Best Lawyers
-
Recognition
10/03/2024
Seyfarth Cited in World Intellectual Property Review’s 2024 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
-
Recognition
06/11/2024
Three Seyfarth Lawyers and the Firm Earn Recommended Status from IAM Patent 1000
-
Recognition
02/07/2024
Seyfarth Achieves National Ranking in World Trademark Review 1000 for 2024